All compatibility checks

Compatibility check

Can you run Qwen2.5 14B Instruct on the RTX 4090?

Yes — with quantization

Yes, with quantization. Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not fit the RTX 4090 (24 GB) in FP16, but it runs at INT8 (8-bit) using about 17.8 GB (74% of VRAM). Use a GPTQ, AWQ, or GGUF build to get there, and keep prompts moderate to leave room for the KV cache.

Memory breakdown

Weights plus a 0.8 GB KV cache at 4,096tokens, against the card's 24 GB. Verdicts leave ~10% headroom for activations and fragmentation.

PrecisionWeightsKV cacheTotal% of 24 GBFit
FP16 / BF16full quality34 GB0.8 GB34.8 GB145%No
INT8 (8-bit)near-full quality17 GB0.8 GB17.8 GB74%Fits
INT4 (4-bit)GPTQ / AWQ / GGUF Q48.5 GB0.8 GB9.3 GB39%Fits

Planning estimates, not a substitute for profiling. Real usage varies with the inference runtime, batch size, and how much context you actually use — the KV cache grows linearly with prompt length.

GPUs that run Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Cards where this model fits (at its best precision):

Go deeper

Frequently asked questions

Can the RTX 4090 run Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?

Not in FP16, but yes at INT8 (8-bit), where it uses about 17.8 GB versus the card's 24 GB.

How much VRAM does Qwen2.5 14B Instruct need?

Approximately 34 GB in FP16, 17 GB in INT8, and 8.5 GB in 4-bit for the weights, plus a KV cache of about 0.8 GB at 4,096 tokens.

Does quantization let Qwen2.5 14B Instruct fit on the RTX 4090?

Yes. Dropping to INT8 (8-bit) brings total usage to about 17.8 GB, which fits the 24 GB card with headroom for the KV cache.

What happens to memory with longer context?

The KV cache grows linearly with prompt length. At 4,096 tokens it is about 0.8 GB here; doubling the context roughly doubles that term, so long-context use can push a tight fit over the edge.