All compatibility checks

Compatibility check

Can you run Llama 3.1 70B Instruct on the RTX 3070?

Not on a single card

Not on a single RTX 3070. Even at 4-bit, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct needs about 41.9 GB, which exceeds the card's 8 GB. You would need roughly 6× RTX 3070 with tensor parallelism, a larger GPU, or a smaller model.

Memory breakdown

Weights plus a 1.3 GB KV cache at 4,096tokens, against the card's 8 GB. Verdicts leave ~10% headroom for activations and fragmentation.

PrecisionWeightsKV cacheTotal% of 8 GBFit
FP16 / BF16full quality162.4 GB1.3 GB163.7 GB2046%No
INT8 (8-bit)near-full quality81.2 GB1.3 GB82.5 GB1031%No
INT4 (4-bit)GPTQ / AWQ / GGUF Q440.6 GB1.3 GB41.9 GB524%No

Planning estimates, not a substitute for profiling. Real usage varies with the inference runtime, batch size, and how much context you actually use — the KV cache grows linearly with prompt length.

GPUs that run Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Cards where this model fits (at its best precision):

Go deeper

Frequently asked questions

Can the RTX 3070 run Llama 3.1 70B Instruct?

No. Even 4-bit needs about 41.9 GB, more than the 8 GB available.

How much VRAM does Llama 3.1 70B Instruct need?

Approximately 162.4 GB in FP16, 81.2 GB in INT8, and 40.6 GB in 4-bit for the weights, plus a KV cache of about 1.3 GB at 4,096 tokens.

Does quantization let Llama 3.1 70B Instruct fit on the RTX 3070?

Not on a single RTX 3070 — even 4-bit exceeds 8 GB. You would need multiple GPUs or a larger card.

What happens to memory with longer context?

The KV cache grows linearly with prompt length. At 4,096 tokens it is about 1.3 GB here; doubling the context roughly doubles that term, so long-context use can push a tight fit over the edge.