All compatibility checks

Compatibility check

Can you run Qwen2.5 32B Instruct on the A100 80GB?

Yes — with quantization

Yes, with quantization. Qwen2.5 32B Instruct does not fit the A100 80GB (80 GB) in FP16, but it runs at INT8 (8-bit) using about 38.7 GB (48% of VRAM). Use a GPTQ, AWQ, or GGUF build to get there, and keep prompts moderate to leave room for the KV cache.

Memory breakdown

Weights plus a 1 GB KV cache at 4,096tokens, against the card's 80 GB. Verdicts leave ~10% headroom for activations and fragmentation.

PrecisionWeightsKV cacheTotal% of 80 GBFit
FP16 / BF16full quality75.4 GB1 GB76.4 GB96%Tight
INT8 (8-bit)near-full quality37.7 GB1 GB38.7 GB48%Fits
INT4 (4-bit)GPTQ / AWQ / GGUF Q418.9 GB1 GB19.9 GB25%Fits

Planning estimates, not a substitute for profiling. Real usage varies with the inference runtime, batch size, and how much context you actually use — the KV cache grows linearly with prompt length.

GPUs that run Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Cards where this model fits (at its best precision):

Go deeper

Frequently asked questions

Can the A100 80GB run Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Not in FP16, but yes at INT8 (8-bit), where it uses about 38.7 GB versus the card's 80 GB.

How much VRAM does Qwen2.5 32B Instruct need?

Approximately 75.4 GB in FP16, 37.7 GB in INT8, and 18.9 GB in 4-bit for the weights, plus a KV cache of about 1 GB at 4,096 tokens.

Does quantization let Qwen2.5 32B Instruct fit on the A100 80GB?

Yes. Dropping to INT8 (8-bit) brings total usage to about 38.7 GB, which fits the 80 GB card with headroom for the KV cache.

What happens to memory with longer context?

The KV cache grows linearly with prompt length. At 4,096 tokens it is about 1 GB here; doubling the context roughly doubles that term, so long-context use can push a tight fit over the edge.